bill Non-partisan · AI-drafted, editor-reviewed

Patents Amendment Bill

Member in charge: Cameron Brewer
In short: Arapono’s summary

New Zealand has two patent laws — an older one from 1953 and a newer, stricter one from 2013. Some companies have been using a loophole to file new patent applications under the easier 1953 rules, even today. This bill closes that loophole. Any new 'divisional' applications (spin-off applications based on older ones) filed after this bill passes must meet the tougher 2013 standards. This means patents for obvious or weak inventions are less likely to be granted, saving other businesses the cost of challenging them.

What this affects

Tap a topic to see how this bill touches it, and the parts of the text that show it.

Businesses will face less cost and risk from having to challenge weak patents that were granted under older, easier rules

From the bill

This is an issue because the 1953 Act criteria for examining patent applications is of a lower standard than the 2013 Act and can result in unmeritorious inventions being patented.

Third parties (such as other businesses) can later oppose the grant of these patents through a review process or apply to have the patents revoked. However, this is costly and time-consuming for businesses, with no guarantee of success.

The Bill will adjust the 2013 Act so that 1953 Act applications will be examined in broadly the same way as 2013 Act applications. This will avoid the likelihood of a third party having to oppose the grant of a patent.

Progress through Parliament

Introduced
First Reading
Select committee
Second Reading
Whole House
Third Reading
Royal Assent
Current stage: Royal Assent

Have your say

This bill is open for public submissions to the Economic Development, Science and Innovation Committee. Anyone can tell the committee what they think, and you don’t need to be an expert. Submissions close 23 July 2025.

View the official bill on legislation.govt.nz

Bill text sourced from legislation.govt.nz (Parliamentary Counsel Office). Arapono’s summary and breakdown are drafted with AI grounded in that official text and reviewed by an Arapono editor for accuracy and neutrality before publishing. Arapono is non-partisan and takes no position on this bill.