Arapono
Election CentreYour VotePartiesPolicies
Learn
Log inSign up free
Data sourced from:
New Zealand ParliamentElectoral CommissionStats NZNew Zealand TreasuryRadio New Zealand (RNZ)Beehive
Arapono

Navigating New Zealand Politics

An independent, non-partisan political information platform for New Zealanders.

  • Instagram
  • Facebook

Learn

  • Find what matters to you
  • Your Plan
  • How Parliament Works
  • Glossary
  • About Arapono
  • Our Sources

Explore

  • Command Centre
  • Elections
  • Battlegrounds
  • Interactive Map
  • MPs Directory
  • Party Policies
  • Budget 2026
  • Bills Tracker

Account

  • Sign Up Free
  • Log In

Legal

  • Help & FAQ
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Submit a Correction

© 2026 Arapono. All rights reserved.

Arapono is an independent platform. All information is sourced from official NZ government and electoral sources. We are not affiliated with any political party.

Women’s Rights Party on Crime & Justice
Crime & Justice · In depth

Prostitution law, hate crime and women’s prisons

In depth — from Women’s Rights Party’s policy document · November 2025

The Prostitution Reform Act 2003 would be replaced with the Equality Model — decriminalising the prostituted person, criminalising buyers and brothel owners, and funding exit services. On hate crime the party opposes new offences but wants “sex” added to the aggravating factors already in the Sentencing Act. It opposes housing biological males in women’s prisons, and backs a ban on “rough sex” as a defence to murder or serious harm.

Prostitution Reform Act
Replaced
With the Equality, or Nordic, Model
Who is criminalised
Buyers and brothel owners
Not the prostituted person
Section 19
Kept
Barring temporary visa holders from prostitution
Sentencing Act
Add “sex”
To the aggravating factors in section 9(1)(h)
New hate crime laws
Opposed
Standalone sex-based laws preferred
“Rough sex” defence
Banned
In murder or serious harm cases
What the Equality Model would provide
  • Decriminalisation for the prostituted person
  • Criminal liability for those who exploit them — the buyer and the brothel owner
  • Exit services including housing, education, training, legal and welfare services
  • Childcare, and emotional and psychological support to help women build new lives
Where they part from the hate crime proposals
  • No new “hate crime” laws — the party opposes creating them
  • “Sex” added to the Sentencing Act’s existing aggravating factors instead
  • “Gender identity” opposed as an aggravating factor
  • “Hostility” kept as the statutory word rather than “hate”, which they call too subjective and vague

How it would work

Replacing the Prostitution Reform Act

The Equality Model — also called the Nordic Model, Abolition Model or Sex Buyer Law — would replace the Prostitution Reform Act 2003. It decriminalises the prostituted person while criminalising those who exploit them, and pairs that with funded exit services for women wanting to leave: housing, education, training, legal and welfare services, childcare, and emotional and psychological support.

Section 19 in the meantime

While the 2003 Act remains, the document strongly opposes removing section 19, which bars people on temporary visas such as student visas from prostitution. Its stated reason is preventing international trafficking.

“Rough sex” as a defence

The party would work with other groups to call for a ban on using “rough sex” as a defence in a murder case or one involving serious harm. The document links this to its opposition to pornography, which it describes as filmed prostitution.

Hate crime and the Sentencing Act

The position is against new hate crime laws but for a specific amendment. The Sentencing Act’s section 9(1)(h) lists characteristics including race, colour, nationality, religion, gender identity, sexual orientation, age and disability — but not sex. The document argues that absence suggests hating women is more acceptable than other hatreds, and would add “sex” to the list. It opposes hate crime laws generally as creating what it calls a hierarchy of victimhood, and prefers standalone sex-based laws with penalties matching the seriousness of the offence.

Single-sex spaces and prisons

Women and girls would have the right to single-sex gatherings for any purpose, including women-only social media groups, and to single-sex spaces the document lists as including toilets, changing rooms, prisons, refuges, rape crisis centres, saunas, swimming facilities and hospital wards. It opposes housing biological males in women’s prisons, and adds that women prisoners must have humane and supportive conditions for pregnancy, birth and caring for babies.

Refuges, protection orders and exit services

More resource to help women leave domestic violence, public funding for women-only refuge services, public funding for services supporting detransitioners, and exit services for women leaving gangs or religious cults. On the justice system: protection orders enforced, and applications for them accessible and affordable.

In their own words

“The Equality Model decriminalises prostitution for the prostituted person and criminalises those who exploit prostitutes, such as the buyer and brothel owner.”

Policy of the Women’s Rights Party · Prostitution Reform

“We support Section 19, which helps to prevent international trafficking.”

Policy of the Women’s Rights Party · Prostitution Reform

“The Women’s Rights Party does not support the creation of new “hate crime” laws.”

Policy of the Women’s Rights Party · Hate Crimes Legislation

“The Women’s Rights Party opposes the housing of biological males in women’s prisons.”

Policy of the Women’s Rights Party · Protecting women’s and children’s spaces and safety

What the document doesn’t settle

Points the document defers or leaves undefined. These are gaps in the document, not criticisms of the policy.

  • No cost is given for the exit services the Equality Model depends on, or for the increased refuge funding.
  • How the change from the Prostitution Reform Act would work for people currently working legally under it is not addressed.
  • The ban on “rough sex” as a defence is described as something the party would work with others to call for, without naming the legislative change required.
  • Where transgender prisoners would be housed instead is not stated.
  • Whether adding “sex” to section 9(1)(h) would sit alongside “gender identity”, which the party opposes as a listed factor, or replace it, is not resolved.
  • The standalone sex-based laws preferred to hate crime legislation are not specified.
Summarised from Policy of the Women’s Rights Party, published by Women’s Rights Party in November 2025. Read 2026-08-16.
Read the full document
Back to Women’s Rights Party on Crime & Justice

Coverage at a glance

Which party holds a published position on which topic.

Open the compare tool →

Swipe across to see all 11 topics — the party column stays put.

PartyEconomyHousingHealthEducationClimateEnvironmentCrime & JusticeTreaty & Māori AffairsImmigrationForeign PolicyDemocracy & Government
National
Published position∅ No stated position (verified) Not captured yet
∅
Labour∅∅∅∅∅∅
Green
ACT
NZ First
Te Pāti Māori
TOP
Also contesting, without seats in Parliament
Women’s Rights
Animal Justice
ALCP
Conservative
Outdoors & Freedom
Vision NZ
Alliance
Free Palestine
NZ Loyal∅
Te Tai Tokerau∅