Arapono
Election CentreYour VotePartiesPolicies
Learn
Log inSign up free
Data sourced from:
New Zealand ParliamentElectoral CommissionStats NZNew Zealand TreasuryRadio New Zealand (RNZ)Beehive
Arapono

Navigating New Zealand Politics

An independent, non-partisan political information platform for New Zealanders.

  • Instagram
  • Facebook

Learn

  • Find what matters to you
  • Your Plan
  • How Parliament Works
  • Glossary
  • About Arapono
  • Our Sources

Explore

  • Command Centre
  • Elections
  • Battlegrounds
  • Interactive Map
  • MPs Directory
  • Party Policies
  • Budget 2026
  • Bills Tracker

Account

  • Sign Up Free
  • Log In

Legal

  • Help & FAQ
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Submit a Correction

© 2026 Arapono. All rights reserved.

Arapono is an independent platform. All information is sourced from official NZ government and electoral sources. We are not affiliated with any political party.

ACT on Democracy & Government
Democracy & Government · In depth

A consolidated bureaucracy: 43 departments into 19

In depth — from ACT’s policy document · 28 June 2026

ACT would merge New Zealand’s 43 government departments into 19 and its 78 ministerial portfolios into 18, so that each department answers to a single minister. Ministers would appoint their own chief executives on fixed renewable terms and be able to remove them for non-performance or policy misalignment, and the Public Service Commission’s functions would move into the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet. The document maps every current department and portfolio to where it would land.

Departments
43 → 19
Norway governs a country our size with 17
Portfolios
78 → 18
Against the 20 the document says Norway needs
Chief executives
Appointed by ministers
Fixed term, renewable once
Public Service Commission
Folded into DPMC
No longer a gatekeeper on appointments
Cited fiscal effect
0.08–0.18% of GDP
Per spending minister, from OECD panel studies
Frontline staff
Not targeted
Consolidation aimed at duplicated head-office functions
Some of the bigger mergers
  • New Zealand Revenue and Customs — Inland Revenue and the Customs Service
  • Ministry of Defence and Security — Defence, the Defence Force, GCSB and NZSIS
  • Ministry of Justice and Law — Justice, Corrections, Police, the Serious Fraud Office, NEMA, Fire and Emergency, and Treaty Settlements
  • Ministry of Cities, Environment, Regions and Transport — Environment, Housing and Urban Development, Transport, Local Government and Infrastructure
  • Ministry of Health and Wellbeing — Health, Health New Zealand, the Cancer Control Agency and ACC
  • Ministry for Culture and Heritage — Ethnic Communities, Pacific Peoples, Seniors, Women, Māori Development, and Arts, Culture and Heritage
Departments left as they are
  • The Treasury
  • Department of Conservation
  • Ministry for Regulation
  • Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade
  • Oranga Tamariki
  • Ministry for Primary Industries
  • MCERT, which the document says would keep reporting to multiple ministers

How it would work

Fewer departments

New Zealand runs 43 departments, which the document says is more than one and a half times what comparable countries carry, each with its own chief executive, communications team, HR and finance. They would be consolidated into 19, grouped around real policy domains so that one department owns an outcome rather than several sharing it. The document lists every current agency and the department it would land in.

Fewer ministers

78 ministerial portfolios would become 18. The argument is that splitting responsibility this far makes problems like housing and crime everyone’s job and nobody’s duty. Combined with the department mergers, each department would report to one minister for its budget and outcomes — with MCERT named as the exception.

Ministers appointing and removing chief executives

The document’s stated problem is that ministers are accountable for delivery but neither appoint nor can remove the chief executives who implement their policies. Ministers would appoint departmental chief executives for a fixed term, renewable once, and could remove them for specified reasons such as non-performance or policy misalignment. Officials would keep public service protections and the right to return to a lower classified role.

What happens to the Public Service Commission

It would no longer sit between ministers and key appointments. Its functions would move into the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet.

Protecting the frontline

The document is explicit that consolidation targets duplicated head-office functions — multiple communications offices, HR teams, finance teams and executive layers — and not nurses, teachers or police. Savings could go back to frontline services, to taxpayers, or to paying down debt.

The research it rests on

The case draws on the “common pool” effect, where many ministers each control part of the budget and each has an incentive to expand their own spending while the cost spreads across all taxpayers. OECD panel studies are cited putting this at roughly 0.08 to 0.18 percent of GDP in additional deficit per spending minister, with a 58-country study and evidence from Swiss cantons pointing the same way. The document lists its sources, including a 2025 New Zealand Initiative report applying the research here.

In their own words

“New Zealand runs one of the most fragmented executives in the developed world. It wasn’t designed, it grew by accident.”

ACT’s plan for a consolidated bureaucracy · Opening statement

“When responsibility is split this far, problems like housing and crime become everyone’s job and nobody’s duty.”

ACT’s plan for a consolidated bureaucracy · Fewer ministers, clearer responsibility

“ACT will let ministers remove chief executives for specified reasons such as non-performance or policy misalignment, but they would retain public service protections and the right to return to a lower classified role.”

ACT’s plan for a consolidated bureaucracy · Accountable chief executives

“Consolidation targets duplicated head-office functions: the multiple communications offices, HR teams, finance teams and executive layers, not nurses, teachers or police.”

ACT’s plan for a consolidated bureaucracy · Protect the frontline

What the document doesn’t settle

Points the document defers or leaves undefined. These are gaps in the document, not criticisms of the policy.

  • No savings figure is given. The document says savings could go to frontline services, taxpayers or debt, but does not estimate them.
  • No cost or timeline is given for carrying out the restructuring itself.
  • “Policy misalignment” as a ground for removing a chief executive is not defined, and the document does not say who would adjudicate it.
  • The research cited estimates the fiscal cost of each additional spending minister, but the document does not convert that into an expected saving from cutting 78 portfolios to 18.
  • Land Information New Zealand is marked “not yet included” in the department it would otherwise join.
  • MCERT is a stated exception to the one-department-one-minister rule, on the grounds that a newly established ministry should not be restructured yet.
  • How many staff would be affected by consolidating duplicated head-office functions is not given.
Summarised from ACT’s plan for a consolidated bureaucracy, published by ACT New Zealand in 28 June 2026. Read 2026-08-16.
Link to the published document to come.
Back to ACT on Democracy & Government

Coverage at a glance

Which party holds a published position on which topic.

Open the compare tool →

Swipe across to see all 11 topics — the party column stays put.

PartyEconomyHousingHealthEducationClimateEnvironmentCrime & JusticeTreaty & Māori AffairsImmigrationForeign PolicyDemocracy & Government
National
Published position∅ No stated position (verified) Not captured yet
∅
Labour∅∅∅∅∅∅
Green
ACT
NZ First
Te Pāti Māori
TOP
Also contesting, without seats in Parliament
Women’s Rights
Animal Justice
ALCP
Conservative
Outdoors & Freedom
Vision NZ
Alliance
Free Palestine
NZ Loyal∅
Te Tai Tokerau∅