Arapono
Election CentreYour VotePartiesPolicies
Learn
Log inSign up free
Data sourced from:
New Zealand ParliamentElectoral CommissionStats NZNew Zealand TreasuryRadio New Zealand (RNZ)Beehive
Arapono

Navigating New Zealand Politics

An independent, non-partisan political information platform for New Zealanders.

  • Instagram
  • Facebook

Learn

  • Find what matters to you
  • Your Plan
  • How Parliament Works
  • Glossary
  • About Arapono
  • Our Sources

Explore

  • Command Centre
  • Elections
  • Battlegrounds
  • Interactive Map
  • MPs Directory
  • Party Policies
  • Budget 2026
  • Bills Tracker

Account

  • Sign Up Free
  • Log In

Legal

  • Help & FAQ
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Submit a Correction

© 2026 Arapono. All rights reserved.

Arapono is an independent platform. All information is sourced from official NZ government and electoral sources. We are not affiliated with any political party.

Women’s Rights Party on Education
Education · In depth

The relationships and sexuality curriculum, and schools

In depth — from Women’s Rights Party’s policy document · November 2025

The party supports the Ministry of Education’s Relationships and Sexuality Education Framework, with unspecified reservations, because it recognises biological sex and drops references to gender. It would require schools to disclose the curriculum fully to parents, dispose of resources conflating sex and gender, keep named outside agencies out of classrooms, guarantee privacy from the opposite sex in toilets and changing rooms, and stop teachers supporting social transition.

RSE Framework
Supported
With reservations the document does not set out
Consent teaching
Must stress under-16s
Cannot legally consent
Parents
Full disclosure
Of what is taught in the curriculum
Outside agencies
Kept out
Inside Out and Qtopia named
Social transition
Not by teachers
Described as a clinical intervention
Referrals
With parents involved
To professionals, per the Cass Report
What schools would be expected to do
  • Give parents and caregivers full disclosure of what is taught in the relationships and sexuality curriculum
  • Dispose of resources that conflate “sex” and “gender”, or confuse sexual orientation with gender
  • Stop outside agencies such as Inside Out and Qtopia providing resources or instruction, especially without a teacher present
  • Guarantee all children privacy from the opposite sex in single-sex spaces such as toilets and changing rooms
  • Support children who do not conform to sex-based stereotypes, or who could grow up attracted to the same sex
  • Refer distress about sex to appropriate professionals, with parents involved in those discussions

How it would work

Why they back the RSE Framework

The document supports the Ministry of Education’s Relationships and Sexuality Education Framework, which replaced the previous guidelines, on the grounds that it recognises the reality of biological sex and removes references to what the document calls the imprecise concept of gender. It records reservations about the Framework but does not say what they are.

Consent

Support for age-appropriate and scientifically accurate education about sexuality, relationships and consent, with one stated requirement: that any discussion of consent in a sexual context must stress that young people under 16 cannot legally consent.

Parents and classroom resources

Schools would give parents and caregivers full disclosure of what is being taught, and dispose of resources that conflate sex with gender or confuse sexual orientation with gender. Outside agencies are named — Inside Out and Qtopia — and would not provide resources or instruction in schools, with the document placing particular weight on cases where the teacher is not present.

Social transition in schools

The document defines social transition as changing appearance to align with stereotypes of the opposite sex or no sex, using different pronouns, and using opposite-sex toilets and changing facilities. Its position is that teachers should not support it, on the stated basis that doing so is a clinical intervention which often leads to medical transition and affects all students, and that it has been happening without parents’ knowledge.

Where a child is distressed

Teachers would refer concerns about children showing signs of distress about their sex to appropriate professionals, which the document attributes to the recommendations of the Cass Report, and all such discussions would involve parents. The document also states that children who do not conform to sex-based stereotypes, or who could grow up same-sex attracted, should be supported.

In their own words

“The Women’s Rights Party supports, with some reservations, the Ministry of Education’s Relationships and Sexuality Education Framework which replaces the previous guidelines.”

Policy of the Women’s Rights Party · Educating our Young People

“any discussion about consent in the context of sexual activity must stress that young people cannot legally consent if they are under 16 years of age.”

Policy of the Women’s Rights Party · Educating our Young People

“Teachers should not be supporting social transitioning in schools. Supporting social transition is a clinical intervention that often leads to medical transitioning and affects all students.”

Policy of the Women’s Rights Party · Educating our Young People

“Children who do not conform to sex-based stereotypes or who could grow up to be attracted to the same sex, should be supported in this.”

Policy of the Women’s Rights Party · Educating our Young People

What the document doesn’t settle

Points the document defers or leaves undefined. These are gaps in the document, not criticisms of the policy.

  • The reservations about the RSE Framework are referred to but never set out.
  • No mechanism is described for requiring schools to disclose curriculum content, dispose of resources or exclude named agencies — whether by guidance, funding condition or legislation.
  • The statement that supporting social transition is a clinical intervention leading often to medical transition is asserted; the Cass Report is cited for referral practice but not for this claim.
  • What happens where a child’s distress involves their parents, and involving parents may not be safe, is not addressed.
  • Whether the expectations apply to private and state-integrated schools as well as state schools is not stated.
  • No cost or timeline is attached to any part of it.
Summarised from Policy of the Women’s Rights Party, published by Women’s Rights Party in November 2025. Read 2026-08-16.
Read the full document
Back to Women’s Rights Party on Education

Coverage at a glance

Which party holds a published position on which topic.

Open the compare tool →

Swipe across to see all 11 topics — the party column stays put.

PartyEconomyHousingHealthEducationClimateEnvironmentCrime & JusticeTreaty & Māori AffairsImmigrationForeign PolicyDemocracy & Government
National
Published position∅ No stated position (verified) Not captured yet
∅
Labour∅∅∅∅∅∅
Green
ACT
NZ First
Te Pāti Māori
TOP
Also contesting, without seats in Parliament
Women’s Rights
Animal Justice
ALCP
Conservative
Outdoors & Freedom
Vision NZ
Alliance
Free Palestine
NZ Loyal∅
Te Tai Tokerau∅