NZ First has a member’s bill to disestablish the Independent Māori Statutory Board, the unelected body created alongside the Auckland Super City in 2010. Its functions, property and obligations would transfer back to Auckland Council. The argument made is accountability: that ratepayers fund the board — $3.5 million last year — without being able to elect or remove its members. The document states the change would not stop the council engaging with Māori.
The Independent Māori Statutory Board was created with the amalgamation of Auckland’s councils in 2010. The document says it was originally established to provide advice, but that its statutory documents and appointments have since become embedded across council planning, funding, procurement and performance systems.
The case rests on elected accountability rather than on the board’s work: that Aucklanders were never asked whether to fund or empower it, that ratepayers pay millions a year including $3.5 million last year, and that they cannot elect or remove its members. The document sets this against rising rates, increasing debt and reductions in core services, calling the result a growing democratic deficit.
The bill provides for an orderly transition of the board’s functions, property and obligations back to Auckland Council, with the stated aim of continuity of council operations.
It states directly that removing the board does not prevent Auckland Council from engaging with Māori or recognising their interests — the stated intent being that such engagement happens through democratically accountable structures instead.
“Aucklanders were never asked whether they agreed to fund or empower a parallel governance system within their council.”
“The removal of the IMSB will ensure that those who influence public spending and public decision making are directly accountable to the public.”
“It does not prevent Auckland Council from engaging with Māori or recognising their interests, rather it ensures that such engagement occurs within democratically accountable structures.”
Points the document defers or leaves undefined. These are gaps in the document, not criticisms of the policy.
Which party holds a published position on which topic.
Swipe across to see all 11 topics — the party column stays put.
| Party | Economy | Housing | Health | Education | Climate | Environment | Crime & Justice | Treaty & Māori Affairs | Immigration | Foreign Policy | Democracy & Government |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| National |
| ∅ |
| Labour | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ |
| Green |
| ACT |
| NZ First |
| Te Pāti Māori |
| TOP |
| Also contesting, without seats in Parliament | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Women’s Rights | |||||||||||
| Animal Justice | |||||||||||
| ALCP | |||||||||||
| Conservative | |||||||||||
| Outdoors & Freedom | |||||||||||
| Vision NZ | |||||||||||
| Alliance | |||||||||||
| Free Palestine | |||||||||||
| NZ Loyal | ∅ | ||||||||||
| Te Tai Tokerau | ∅ | ||||||||||